| ||||||||||||||
You Are
Beautiful By: Naqeeb Stevens Images have profound
effects on people’s beliefs, perceptions and understanding of the
world around them. Often the images received by the masses of the
public do not depict reality truthfully. They are often bias and
manipulated as well as layered with hidden meaning. Deception of
reality can be detrimental as one tries to define his or her own
sense of person. Currently, we live in a world reliant on the media.
Media provides people with information and news about countries and
cultures all around the world. The media also plays a vital role in
our economy through commercialism. One aspect of commercialism is
advertisement, which entails “getting one’s message noticed among
the thousands of promotion messages and other data people are
flooded with everyday” (Reichart 22)1.
People are affected greatly by what the media presents because of it
is ubiquity in society. Sometimes in order to effectively sell a
product, advertisers manipulate images to make them seem more
appealing. Two key tools of advertisement are sex and the idea of
beauty. Beauty is a forever changing idea. As the Illustrated Oxford
dictionary defines, beauty is a combination of qualities that
pleases the aesthetic senses. In every aspect of the media and
commercialism beauty is constantly manipulated, illustrated and
produced. Currently society obsesses with material. This obsession
has led to a materialistic trend in which people define themselves
by their possessions, which are only superficial. Is beauty more
than skin deep? From looking at the current advertisements shown in
magazine, newspapers, and television one may conclude that it is
not. The term beautiful has come to loosely mean attractive or in
style by companies for the sake of making profit. Media and
commercialism prostitutes the concept of beauty.
Beauty has no standard. However currently, due to commercial
influence there is certain qualities people associate with beauty.
Those qualities derive from “the continued cultural and communal
conditioning we receive every day of our lives that physical beauty
does have a standard…it is in our newspapers, on our television, in
our motion picture houses, on our advertising billboards…[and] in
our daily interaction with our fellow human beings”(Beauty
2)2. Through all of these
interventions we have become accustomed to think in a restrictive
manner. The idea of _expression through physical appearance has now
become altered by the emphasis on enhancements and the profound
effect media and commercialism has on the human body. Enhancers did
not aid physical appearance. “Greek sculpture did not idealize an
abstract body, but rather sought an ideal Beauty through a synthesis
of living bodies, a synthesis that became the vehicle for
_expression of a psychophysical Beauty that harmonized body and
soul” (Eco 45)
3. Then beauty was not
affected by commercialization. Currently the social belief in what
is beautiful is based on an overall opinion and not of the
individual. This is an effect of social conditioning. We have a
small ability “of refuting this overwhelming tidal wave of
conditioning” (Beauty 2)4. It is evident that
images play a key role in the world and its development not only of
a society but also of a people. People receive many images, “some of
the most powerful images in documentary history … [which may be]
photographic and cinematic images of war, poverty, and disease. Are
they beautiful or ugly, these images? Or are they beyond standards
of beauty and ugliness? ...What is our relationship to the images,
and to the experience behind them?”(Halprin 264)5. Standards are
developed in an attempt to establish formality. Establishing
formality in an idea as aesthetic as beauty is impossible. There can
never be one model. The bombardment of images is creating a sense of
social normality. The connection one gets “when… see[ing] these
kinds of commercials…they make you think that’s the normal, that
it’s normal to have these kinds of feelings. And it’s normal to
expect to have a beer commercial with beautiful women in it.
Basically, what’s normal-kind of like a mass consent thing (Art,
30)” (Shields 71)6. If people constantly
see a certain thing it will become common to them.
The only
individual idea people have is preference. “If we accept the premise
that we are all individually physically unique, where even identical
twins of the same sex have some slight difference…then where is the
standard against which we measure physical beauty…we can [only] say
we prefer [different qualities]”(Beauty 1)7. In essence, a standard
is merely a guideline or a trend produced through social
conditioning. It is impossible to clearly define what is beautiful
and what is ugly. One “might say that both ugliness and beauty are
matters of mass hypnosis” (Halprin 187)8. Prostitution denotes the
use of a certain idea for corrupt practices. An aspect this
prostitution is American obsession over material wealth. Through
material, and money American society believes that it can attain
anything. That idea is true to a certain extent. Because of today’s
society money can one almost anything. Money can buy one looks and
money can make one beautiful, at least from the commercial
perspective. The nature of popular
culture has helped to demoralize beauty. “Perhaps popular culture is
inevitably vulgar but today’s is more vulgar at any time in the
past” (Shea124)9. Out of this
demoralization due to vulgarity beauty became association with
another idea; materialism. One aspect of beauty is physical
attractiveness. People want to enhance their features to become more
beautiful or achieve the look of models and movie stars, who
themselves have probably done the same thing. At the core of that is
the idea that money can in fact buy you beauty, because it has
almost become tangible. Madonna was correct in her song Material
Girl which includes lyrics that say “Living in a material world and
I am a material girl. You know that we are living in a material
world. And I am a material girl” (Brown)10. That describes pop
culture. Although the song debuted in 1984 it still has relevance in
today’s popular culture. Just as Madonna defined herself as a
“material girl” we have become a material society. Without a
doubt the clothes and other material objects advertised by models,
do help glorify the beauty of the human figure but at the same time
the body is only a prop to sell the product. In that sense beauty is
being prostituted to attract money. Although the physical aspects of
the body are highlighted are considered beautiful, they are not all
the time natural. In order “to market…[beauty] products
advertisers unearthed a need they exploited as best they know how-
the need to be attractive and loved”(Reichart 82-3)11. Commercialism plays on
popular culture and imitates it in order to sell products. People
“wear jeans or designer clothes and wear their hair or make up
according to the model of Beauty offered by glossy magazines, the
cinema, or television- in other words by the mass media. These
people follow the ideas of beauty as suggested by the world of
commercial consumption” (Eco 418)12. We as a society seem
to rely upon the widespread acceptance of an idea instead of being
our own person. When wearing the clothes one sees advertised and
fitting perfectly on this model, one can assume that he or she too
can achieve this state of being. Magazine “readers themselves are
often ambivalent about the pleasure mixed up with anxiety that they
provide.” I buy them”, a young women told me…They give me a weird
mixture of anticipation and dread, a sort of stirred-up euphoria.
Yes! Wow! I can be better starting from right this minute! Look at
Her! Look at her!” (Wolf 62)13. Due to the association
with material the idea of beauty is being diminished. Society tends
to be drawn so much towards definition through material “because
there is such an emphasis on the production of beauty…bodies are
sculpted by exercise and draped with clothing” (Halprin
257)
14. I
would like to reiterate the idea of “production of beauty”.
Currently we as a society can produce anything. But the idea of
production suggests that anyone can acquire this state of beauty,
which is true because aside from everything every person has a
unique beauty of his or her own. Produce leads one to believe that
with some material or change one can achieve it. Leading people to
believe that with material they can become that type of being,
society’s beautiful, commercial beauty. If it can be produced then
it can be attained. In that, the media and consumerism is
diminishing the idea of real beauty by adding layers of
commercialization and artificiality and indirectly telling people
that with one product they too can be what they see and what is
praised. It is nothing more than a tool to make money. There is
nothing wrong with making money but the problem occurs when an
entire society has become obsessed with something fake.
Society’s lack
individuality is caused by the ever growing connection with media
and everyday life. The media is creating “a growing web of related
icons in which cultural ideas and ideals are gendered, communicated,
and preserved” (Kitch 191)15. It is indirectly
perpetuating a cycle unrecognized by society. Due to a desire to be
attractive, from the current social perspective and assumed standard
some people feel a constant need to measure up. It is natural and
apart of life to feel a sense of lo love and self acceptance.
Women especially in “this society…carry... a ready checklist
of body attributes that… [they] feel are society’s ideal of beauty.
This idea was based on “discussions of body cropping in terms of
men’s definitions of what is attractive. These responses suggest
that advertisers supply the public with a male vision of beauty,
centered on the perfection of individual body parts and virtually
nothing else” (Shields 44)16. This suggests that the
exterior is the most important feature. It is the most persuasive.
The excess we have seems to determine who we are. We as a
culture look to the images in magazines, on billboards, on
television to provide us with entertainment. It goes unknown that
the images we receive are actually conditioning our minds to
formulate and think according to a standard. There is a saying that
“clothes don’t make the man, the man makes the clothes”. However, it
appears as though the clothes are actually making the people. It is
making them spend money, and worse define themselves by the brand
and mental association of self worth and beauty.
The commercial idea of
beauty is all based on the superficial. People forget that the
images of beauty that the Media portrays are merely creations in
order to sell a product. It is evident that “beauty and good looks
turn people on, and advertisers have known that for a long time and
that attractive models draw attention…advertisers also know that
attractive models serve as an implicit argument to buy the brand:
Good-looking people use the brand , so the brand will make you good
looking”(Reichart 34)17. Everyone wants to
achieve a certain look. Unfortunately, the “look” people want to
achieve comes at a high cost. It is not without strain and struggle
that people go through in order to achieve “the look”. We base our
feelings of beauty on the social ideals. Due to those standards, we
constantly try to emulate match that. Theory states that it is human
nature to compare oneself to another and that social structural
factors influence which referents will be
chosen(Milkie199)18. The most important goal
in advertising is to sell. If women are the targets, perhaps skin is
shown to reveal the brands beauty enhancing benefits. It is natural
and importation to have nice skin by at the center of the
advertisement is the use off beauty as a lure for profit.
Essentially companies are saying that beauty can be bought. Because
of its prominence and importance in society, the media is shaping
people’s minds to believe that what is being shown is the definite
truth. One woman observed an advertised woman’s figure as “society’s
ideal because of the appealing curves … [and] her breasts… stuck
out… [but came to conclude that] no [real] women would stand like
this” (Shields 44)19. The woman’s
conclusion suggests that at least within our society there is some
recognition of a distortion of reality. Constantly people obsess
over their figure. They want to look better. People want to lose
weight. The reason they are so overweight is because of
overindulgence and lack of self-control when eating and monitoring
their diet. Not only are dieticians saying that obesity is
unhealthy but media is saying that it is unattractive. Regardless if
it is or is not, the bottom line is the profound influence in the
media. In fact, there are new scientific drugs made in
order to enhance ones features. One of which is botox, which helps
decrease aging in the face. Cosmetic surgery is at its highest
interest. Advertisements for lipo-suction, breast enhancements, and
tummy tucks flood the daily air-waves, newspapers and magazines. It
appears that commercially, how one looks defines his or her beauty.
Is this health consciousness or obsession? Beauty, although a
definition not intentionally defined by corporations is being
manifested in the minds of society because of the media’s profound
influence. Women’s beauty in the media is based on two aspects: face
and figure because the media seems to set the standard of beauty
“women spend great sums of money…to emulate the flawless faces on
magazine covers and movie posters” (Halprin 257)20. It is not wrong to
adore what one considers great. However, altering the body because
beauty is socially defined by those people is wrong. Another reason
for this is the importance and involvement sex has become. Beauty
goes hand in hand with sex in advertisement. Sex further demoralizes
beauty. Sex itself is a
persuasive device used to lure people. It attracts attention.
Sexuality is one of the most recognizable traits of today’s media.
People constantly want to be sexy or become sexier. Like beauty the
media uses sex to turn a profit. Beauty is irrelevant in commercial
sex. Sex sells and that’s the bottom line. The issue of sex is deep
rooted in American culture. Conflicting ideas date back into puritan
society, “but it appears…that the essential thing is not this
economic factor, but rather the existence in our era of a discourse
in which sex, the revelation of truth, the over turning of global
laws, the proclamation of a new day to come, and the promise of a
certain felicity are linked together” (Foucault 7)21. Sex is grabbing and
rebellious. Advertisement realized what great affect sex has on
attracting attention so companies capitalized on it. Unfortunately,
while sex is helping companies make money, which is ultimately
helping the economy; it is demeaning the idea of beauty and people’s
perception of it. Companies seek to fulfill human desires such as
the desires such as “more romance and intimacy… [and qualities] to
attract beautiful people” (Reichart 22)22. One way to have those
desires is to “just pull out your pocket book” (Reichart
22)23. There is a
connection between money and beauty. At the root of it all is
capitalism. Money is the driving force and in order to get money t
some things must be sacrificed and used. Sex sells beauty. Everyone
wants to be beautiful its part of life. Unfortunately people
associate their beauty with the ideals and values proposed by the
mass media, commercialism and advertisements. People are misinformed
through commercialism that what is shown; the physical depiction of
beauty solely based on the appearance and material is its definite
form. One person concluded from an advertisement: “She is blonde,
she’s got big boobs, skinny arms, skinny stomach, I mean she is
build perfectly as far as what men like in women….She is very
beautiful. She is society’s ideal. She sells top products so she
must be society’s ideal” (Shields 44)24. Is it true that what
sells the most must be the best? With that in mind, the idea of
beauty at least commercially rests only within the material one has.
This results in social conditioning to believe that the idea is
true. It is evident in today’s society how we people obsess over our
looks. It is natural to see beauty in the physical form, but what we
as a society now have become obsessed with is how we can alter and
manipulate ourselves to fit a standard created by the media, in
their efforts to sell a product. It is natural part of the Darwinian
idea of “survival of the fittest”, in this case survival of the
prettiest of both men and women. Some of these images may even help
people gain a sense of self-confidence. Certainly “sex in
advertising doesn’t always promise to make consumers sexual magnets
or reapers of sexual pleasures; it can offer consumers the
opportunity to feel better about themselves” (Reichert
38)25.
Appearance although many would disagree in efforts not to appear
shallow plays a large role in society. Sex just like
materialism and the obsession with material displayed to the public
eye as a capitalistic tool is conditioning the minds of the viewers
to believe beauty is what is being shown. In essence it is creating
a definition. A definition, which I have stated before has no
foundation but mere commercialism. Within sex which is overly
commercialized, we see beauty but is sexy beautiful? It appears as
though there are two different levels of reality and consciousness
that we as a society must become aware. First is the level of the
media, which is determined to help companies advertise and at any
rate sell a product. The second level is the reality issue.
Distortion of reality goes farther than just the idea of beauty but
also exists in the idea of politics. Reality is not on television.
Reality is everyday life. Society is being spoon fed beliefs
produced by the media. The third level is complete propaganda. If
one believes that what is shown is real then they will forever be
stuck. Beauty is the easiest example to illustrate this, as I have
mentioned before about standards and people who attempt to live up
to standards. The media portrays unrealistic images of considered
beauty creating a standard many try to live up to. The obsession
with looks shows that we believe beauty exists in the material and
if desired, falsely, can be attained through superficial alteration.
Our society has become so obsessed with commercial and material that
even an idea such as beauty is now a victim. What happed to the sate
of beauty that did not exist in such a commercial form? It appears
as though it has died or become overshadowed by the dark cloud of
commercialism, materialism and obsession with artificialities.
Coupled with beauty is
the idea of ugliness and the unattractiveness. For everything
positive there must be some sort of negative. The media plays on the
idea of ugly as a contrast to beauty to make profit. First, realize
that this comparison of beauty versus ugly exist more than just in
advertisement but in everyday life. Ugliness repels us where as
beauty attracts us. Like beauty, the definition is somewhat of a
mass consent although, ugly is more based on personal preference;
likes and dislikes. Beauty involves like ugliness “the willingness
to identify with … appearance over time”
(Halprin187)26. The media can’t define
what is beautiful and what is ugly. It can only provide images and
ideas to the public. The people must make a decision themselves as
to what to think and believe. That decision is being made
unconsciously. We don’t decide what is beautiful instead we rely on
the media and opinions of others to dictate it for us. Media plays
on human’s natural desire to be accepted and content. It utilizes
beauty and ugliness negatively because it “is as much of a challenge
as any other difference from mainstream values…ugliness is entirely
a subjective judgment, based on a consensus by those who observe,
whether they are external judges or
internal”(Halprin187)27. With this idea of
superficial, materialism, standards and aura of popular culture
propelled and backed by the media, people’s perception of who they
are is diminished. The problem occurs when you have an entire
society brainwashed and conforming to one idea of beauty, which is
commercial. What about non-commercial? Beauty is in the eyes of the
beholder. Many people who do not have the look or posses the
specific objects the media has deemed to distinguish beautiful are
still beautiful. Our society is headed down a road of mass
conformity. This idea of beauty
illustrates social conformity in America. It is not the same in
other countries where the media is not as defining in cultural and
traditional beliefs. I say the media is prostituting beauty because
in fact it is being used. To prostitute means to corrupt through
with unworthy purposes. Beauty once used to be seen through nature,
but because it does not turn a profit in our capitalistic society it
is irrelevant and dismissed. Once, “beauty was a quality that could
be possessed by natural things (such as moonlight, a fine fruit, a
beautiful color” (Eco 10)28, now it seems that it
does not exist as such. America relies on commercialism to
depict beauty. There are different levels: physical and intangible.
It would be wrong of me to say beauty doesn’t reside within the
physical because to an extent it does.
There are many people who cannot afford the material objects that
seem to define beauty. Some people cannot afford to have plastic
surgery. Often this obsession over the superficial can cause harm to
the body. It is evident that these images of beauty, as depicted
through the figure of women are a main cause in teenage anorexia. So
is this beauty? Why do we believe something that is so detrimental?
Women who appear to be most affected and used by the media stand out
in the numbers of anorexia. According to some magazines “90 to 95
percent of anorexics and bulimics are women… [and] America has the
greatest number” (Wolf 181)29. But where has this
epidemic developed? People do have to the ability to make their own
mind and live healthy. One might say it is possible to resist. But
living in a society based on such aspects as materialism and the
superficial which has been ingrained into “popular culture” it is
hard not to be affected. Skinny became beautiful. It became
commercially appealing as Vogue magazine introduced a model
nicknamed Twiggy, who had “legs… [that looked] as though she ha[d]
not had enough milk as a baby” (Wolf 184-5)30. When this “new beauty”
was introduced to the public by the media people, women in
particular strived to emulate it. This clearly shows the profound
effect commercialism has on a society. This commercialized
beauty is nothing real. How can beauty be so limited especially when
it “has never been absolute and immutable but has taken on different
aspects depending on the historical period of the country: and this
does not hold only for physical beauty”(Eco 14)31. Association of beauty
has led to conformity. It shows how malleable the minds of members
of our American society are. We believe everything and base our
beliefs on what is shown. It takes a sense of self
realization to resist the constant media output, telling people to
buy this clothing or change clothes so that they will achieve the
state of beauty as seen on television. Society will, through
“understanding… [the relationship between beauty and ugliness be
able to] play with these culturally assigned roles and transcend the
stereotypes [created and perpetuated by the media]” (Halprin
10)32. If you consider
something beautiful, then it is. If one considers something ugly
then it is. The media is only concerned with making money. People
need to resist. If society does not break free from the mindset that
the media defines beauty, we will forever be slaves to the time.
Beauty can exist in everything and should not be based on what the
media defines it to be. I merely want to point
out that the direction our American culture is taking regarding
appearance and attractiveness, and definition of beauty. The basis
of commercialism and consumerism is not real. It is just a ploy to
sell products and make money. We as a society must transcend and
promote situations of self-realization and self-affirmation. You are
beautiful. We as a people are beautiful. Do other countries suffer
from the same sort of social conditioning or does it only exist in
America? The land of the free has turned into the land of the
confused and the manipulated. Everything that seemed sacred of
intangible has now become commoditized and associated with money.
Advertising elicits a notion to buy a product and should not be
definitive of a social belief. The media has in fact and will
continue to prostitute beauty and other aesthetics for its needs,
but we as a society do not have to take the bait. I would like to
conclude by proposing a question of morality to help find a reason
and alternative for this social epidemic. If in fact we are all
human beings, why play on each other’s own sense of self and being
to turn a profit that will not matter at the end of time.
| ||||||||||||||
© 2006 Philosophy
Paradise |